Environment. How Much Does Smoking Affect The Environment?
Environment. There Are Lots Of Smokers, Surely It Has An Effect On The Envirnonment. I'm Curious To Know The Statistics Of Say Smoking Against Car Pol
Environment : How Much Does Smoking Affect The Environment
There are lots of smokers, surely it has an effect on the envirnonment. I'm curious to know the statistics of say smoking against car pollution. It would be another reason for my girlfriend to quit. ~~~ Dylan ~~~
Best Answer To Environment Question
Each cigarette manufacturing machines uses 4 miles of paper per hour which could be used instead for many other important things. Tobacco is the most widely grown non-food crop in 120 countries therefore less land is available for food crop. Between 10 to 20 million people could be fed if food crop was grown in its place. Burning tobacco is the main source of indoor pollution in the developed world as it contains over 4,000 dangerous chemicals. One whole tree is needed to cure the tobacco for 300 cigarettes . Cigarette smoke generates contains two of the main gases related to the greenhouse effect they are carbon dioxide and methane.
All Answers To Environment Questions
Answer 1Negligible. That is not a reason to quit. Comparing a car to a cigarette is like comparing a molehill to Everest
Answer 2it only effects the environment in closed spaces.
Answer 3Unless you include the environmental damage caused by all the medical care a smoker will need in his life (energy to build and operate an MRIs, iron lungs etc) then the effect is negligable.
Answer 4The impact is probably so small. It is countries like China and the US that need to start making changes, they pump out so much crap from industries, even if eveyone in the UK did something to try and help the environment, unless these countries make changes there is no point. Tell your girlfriend she is smoking poison and smoking causes really bad wrinkles in woman that may help!
Answer 5Only 6 billion tons of CO2 are produced by humans each year...90 Billion tons are produced by biological activity in the oceans each year, 90 billion tons are produced by volcanos and decomposing carbon based life each year. Humans have only contributed % to global warming. The amount created by smoking is NOTHING. The amount created by the human species is NEXT TO NOTHING. IT'S ALL A BIG LIE. WHY WOULD YOU START BELIEVING YOUR GOVERNMENT NOW, THEY HAVE LIED ABOUT ONE THING OR ANOTHER ALL YOUR LIFE. IT'S A TAX GRAB, THIS JUNK SCIENCE HAS BEEN DUBUNKED BY MANY INDEPENDENT NON-GOVERNMENT AFFILIATED SCIENTISTS. IF YOU BELIEVE THE HUMAN RACE CAN ALTER MOTHER NATURE TO THE POINT OF DESTROYING THE WORLD, YOU MUST BELIEVE THE WORLD IS FLAT AND THE SUN REVOLVES AROUND THE EARTH. Liars never lie: CO (carbon monoxide) yes, is a killer, but plays a very very small roll in global warming. It plays a much larger roll in smog over cities and dirty air in cities. For the record, I am in complete agreement with car pooling to work, public transport in cities, clean air act for industrial areas, incineration of harmful gases that contribute to smog. This is a major problem in cities like Mexico city, Los Angeles, London( you don't see so much, because the rain carries it back to earth, but it's there), Lima, Bejing, Tokyo(all of Japan really) among others. This is far more dangerous to people than second hand smoke, or global warming, and as such should be resolved by local legislation, meaning me, living in the country should not have to pay for your fast paced, energy comsuming, lifestyle. It's bad enough that city dwellers are legislating against my country pleasure already. Where I live, the mornings are crisp, clear, and the air is CLEAN. Now as for CFC's(, CFCL3(CFC-11),CFC-12(CF2CL2) CFC-113(C2F3CL3) CFC-114(C2F4CL2) CFC-115(C2F5CL)), a few facts for you. CFC's have a lifetime of about 20-100 years and due to one free chlorine atom do significant damage to the ozone molecules in their lifetime. When CFC's were discovered they were thought to be a wonder product. CFC's are non-toxic, non-flammable, non-carcinogenic. They were put into wide use as coolant, solvent, blowing agent, and propellant for aerosols, much of our current modern lifestyle had been made by CFC's. However in the early 80's sattilite imaging revealed the damage in the stratospheric ozone, this was investigated and it was revealed that the chlorine atoms in CFC's were the primary(not only, 80%) cause. Hence, the 1987 Montreal Protocol agreement. This was signed by 24 industrialized nations. This agreement basically stated that these countries would phase down CFC's and other ozone depleting chemicals such as Halons and Halocarbons. NO NEW CFC's HAVE BEEN PRODUCED IN DEVELOPED NATIONS SINCE 1995. The only aerosols using CFC's in the developed world are asthma inhalers and they also are being phased out. Only % of aerosols world wide now contain CFC's. Due to the life of chlorine atoms it will be many years before we see any real progress in the containment of the hole in the ozone, but THIS PROBLEM HAS BEEN DEALT WITH. How does this affect Global Warming. IT DOESN'T. Unlike unreliable data gained from ground based temperature monitoring systems, sattilite imaging has shown a negligable to zero increase in global temperature from a 100 years ago.
Answer 6It's not just affecting the environment, it affect there health, breath you can smell it on there hair and clothes, I would not like to kiss a smoker. And if they smoke in a small area they are making other people smoke that don't wont to. I'm an Asthmatic and if someone smokes near me it can set of an attack. Have you ever seen smoke damage on curtains they are black and full of soot that what also happens to your lungs, how can that be good.
Answer 7Smoking has little affect really. It is actually nothing compare to what billions of cars and factories can do. These things produce tonnes and tonnes of waste and exhaust and release them into the air. This is a daily basis and it affects the environment in a big way. So, I'd say smoking is just nothing.
Answer 8Depends on how much smoking you do .
Answer 9Smoking has a large effect on the environment, not in the way you think, but the way the tobacco crop is harvested and grown are horrendously harmful to the environment. They use horrendous pesticides that do nothing but make the insect population more resistant to them, once tobacco has been grown in an area nothing else will grow there. And they use so much water in the processes that it far out weighs the difference between them and normal crops
Answer 10Smoking to car pollution is relatively small. But, well, smoking inside a closed room is more environmentally unfriendly than a cars on the road. And some people might be angry to her if she blow the smoke to them, whether she do it on purpose or not. nick c: CO2 isn't very harmful to the world, especially since nature produces it too, and CO2 isn't poisonous, except at a very high level, :: BUT :: you didn't mention the CO, which is poisonous at low amount. You didn't mention about CFC and other substances, which is the main O3 decomposer.
Answer 11It can cause pollution for people in the same room who are non smokers, apart from that it would not cause pollution to the environment.
Answer 12Each cigarette manufacturing machines uses 4 miles of paper per hour which could be used instead for many other important things. Tobacco is the most widely grown non-food crop in 120 countries therefore less land is available for food crop. Between 10 to 20 million people could be fed if food crop was grown in its place. Burning tobacco is the main source of indoor pollution in the developed world as it contains over 4,000 dangerous chemicals. One whole tree is needed to cure the tobacco for 300 cigarettes . Cigarette smoke generates contains two of the main gases related to the greenhouse effect they are carbon dioxide and methane.
Answer 13People have been smoking for a long longer than there has been cars etc. Therefore if any damage to environment I think we would have seen something by now.
Answer 14Well I'm no fan of smoking, but it has to be said that smokers do not constantly smoke, whereas cars do (while in use, and for some that is all day). The discarded stubbs are biodegradable, most of a car is not, particularly used engine oil and tyres. I think you should look at the personal cost of smoking, both health and financial.
Answer 15Smoking does diddle squat to the environment on its own. More important is what it's doing to your girl friend in the years to come: Links to Breast Cancer, Throat Cancer, Gum Disease and most important Ovarian Cancer. If you want her to have healthy babies tell her to give up now or bugger off. Lay down down the law if you are man enough.
Answer 16my grandfather smoked he lived to the age of 96 the only time he went to the hospital was to visit my grandmother who did not smoke and the machines that are used to make cigarettes will probably be used to make bombs in the future i do not smoke but my wife does and it does not bother me what bothers me is all the soot in the atmosphere from cars and planes and from factories that is where all the harm is coming from no bans there
Answer 17Remember the old adage . Every little bit helps
Answer 18Just try and find the most worrying factors that would help here quit. Eg fat, wrinkles etc. Don't force her she we just lie to you. Just give some support when she chooses to quit.
Copyright 2008 SearchWebEngine.com, All rights reserved.
